Esthetic Restorations, The Putty Matrix Technique

Authors

  • Arshad Hasan DUHS
  • Omer Shahid Department of Operative Dentistry, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Putty matrix, composite restoration, esthetic restoration

Abstract

The predictable esthetic restoration of broken incisal edge of maxillary central incisors is a demanding and technique sensitive procedure. Its success is dependent on operator’s skills and knowledge and also on adhering to a systematic and problem solving approach. It is important that not only the anatomy is replicated, also the various shades are placed in accurate thickness and position. This perfect blend of accurately placed shades gives the most natural and esthetic outcome. The current report is about esthetic restorations in adjacent maxillary central incisors using a lingual matrix. A systematic and problem solving approach made possible an esthetic outcome of the case and resulted in an extremely satisfied patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arshad Hasan, DUHS

Associate Professor & Head, Department of Operative Dentistry

References

Felippe LA, Monteiro SJ, Andrada CA, Cerqueira AD, Ritter AV. Clinical strategies for success in proximoincisal composite restorations. Part I: Understanding color and composite selection. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:336-47.

Ritter AV. Posterior composites revisited. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20:57-67.

McCracken MS, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, Funkhouser E, Fellows JL, Shamp DG, et al. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144:583-

Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998 ;29:483-90.

Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18:256-65.

Denehy GE. Simplifying the Class IV lingual matrix. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:312-9.

Franco EB, Francischone CE, Medina-Valdivia JR, Baseggio W. Reproducing the natural aspects of dental tissues with resin composites in proximoincisal restorations. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:505-10.

Felippe LA, Monteiro S, De Andrada CA, Ritter AV. Clinical strategies for success in proximoincisal composite restorations. Part II: Composite application technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:11-21.

Al-Khayatt AS, Chaudhuri AR, Poyser NJ, Briggs PF, Porter RW, Kelleher MG et al. Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:389-401.

Robertson A, Andreasen FM, Bergenholtz G, Andreasen JO, Noren JG. Incidence of pulp necrosis subsequent to pulp canal obliteration from trauma of permanent incisors. J Endod. 1996;22:557-60.

Xu H, Jiang Z, Xiao X, Fu J, Su Q. Influence of cavity design on the biomechanics of direct composite resin restorations in Class IV preparations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:161-7.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-28

How to Cite

Hasan, A., & Shahid, O. (2013). Esthetic Restorations, The Putty Matrix Technique. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences (JDUHS), 7(3), 122–125. Retrieved from https://jduhs.com/index.php/jduhs/article/view/1542

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3

Section

Technique

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Arshad Hasan, Omer Shahid

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the Journal of Dow University of Health Sciences are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium; provided the original work is properly cited and initial publication in this journal.