Evaluation Method of Bonding To Root Canal Dentin After Sodium Hypochlorite Treatment*

Authors

  • Alaa M. Ei Araby Associate Professor, Department of Dental Bio-Materials, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

Root canal dentin, self adhesive, sodium hypocholorite, punch out sher bond strength

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Shear bond strength test is a common test to evaluate the bond between restorative materials and tooth structure but it cannot measure the marginal adaptation of the restorative filling materials. Therefore, in this research an evaluation method of punch out test was employed to evaluate resin bonding to root canal wall dentin by measuring both marginal adaptation and shear bond strength simultaneously.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the reliability and efficiency of punch out shear test to evaluate the effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as a root canal irrigant on composite resin bonding to canal dentin and also to evaluate the contraction gap formation from the same specimen. The null hypothesis tested was that treatment of root canal with NaOCl would not compromise bonding to root canal dentin, whether a total etching adhesive or self-etching adhesive was used.
Materials and Methods: A total etching adhesive system (Optibond Solo Plus) and a self etching adhesive system (XenoIII) were employed in this study. A standardized truncated cone cavity (4 mm in base diameter, 3 mm in depth and a convergence angle of 5° ), was prepared at the top portion of the root canal. The cavities were subjected to sodium hypochlorite treatment for different periods of time and then rinsed with distilled water. Then, one of the aforementioned dentin bonding systems was applied to the cavity walls according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cavities were then filled with a micro-hybrid composite resin. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nomoto R, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Suitability of a shear punch test for restorative materials. Dent Mater

; 17:415-21.

American Society for Testing and Materials standards. Standard Test Method for Shear Strength of Plastics by

Punch Tool, ASTM D732-46, 1993.

British Standard. Methods of testing plastics BS2782, Method 305A and 305B Shear Strength, 1970.

Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post

reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42:39-44.

Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet

Dent 1990; 63:529-36.

Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In: Cohen, S. and Burns, R.C, (eds):

Pathway of the pulp. 7th ed, Mosby; Missouri, pp.691- 717, 1998.

Eliades G, Vougiouklakis G. Palaghias: Effect of dentin primers on the morphology, molecular composition and

collagen conformation of acid-dematerialized dentin in situ. Dent Mater 1999; 15:310-17.

Ari H, Erdemir A, Belli SJ. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the micro hardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. J Endod 2004; 30:792-5.

Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993; 9:19-22.

Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999; 78:898-905.

Inaba D, Ruben J, Takagi O, Arends J. Effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment on demineralization of human dentine in vitro. Caries Res 1996; 30:218-24.

West JD, Rone JB. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. In: Cohen, S. and Burns, R. C. (eds): Pathway of the pulp. 7th ed, Mosby; Missouri, pp.203-57, 1998.

Barbosa K, Safavi KE, Spangberg SW. Influence of sodium hypochlorite on the permeability and structure of cervical human dentin. Int Endod J 1994; 27:309-12.

Wakabayashi Y, Kondou Y, Suzuki K, Yatani H, Yamashita A. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7:302-06.

Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin shear bond strength and interfacial ultrastructure with and without a hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1997; 22:159-66.

Nikaido T, Takano Y, Sasafuchi Y, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Bond strengths to endodontically-treated teeth. Am

J Dent 1999: 12:177-80.

Perdigão J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, GarcíaGodoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 2000; 16:311-23.

Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-Prep on

bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001; 27:753-7.

Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC, Park JB. Effect of hybrid layer on fracture toughness of adhesively bonded dentin-resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 91-8.

Inai N, Kanemura N, Tagami J, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. Adhesion between collagen depleted dentin and dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1998; 11:123-7.

Inoue S, Murata Y, Sano H, Kashiwada T. Effect of NaOCl treatment on bond strength between indirect

resin core-buildup and dentin. Dent Mater J 2002; 21:343-54.

Mount GJ, Makinson OF, Peters MCRB. The strength of auto-cured and light-cured materials. The shear punch

test. Aust Dent J 1996; 41:118-23.

Boschian PL, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out

tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 18:596-602.

Lai SCN, Mak YF, Cheung GSP, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, et al. Reversal of compromised

bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res 2001; 80:1919-24.

ISO/TR11405: 1994: Dental materials-Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. 1994.

Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying

filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation, Dent Mater 2003; 19:206-11.

Nomoto R, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials, Dent

Mater 2001; 17:415-21.

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting- stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the

restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636-39.

Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Yamashita T, Wakumoto S, et al. Effect of multiple application of

a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resinbased composite. Am J Dent 2002; 15:159-63.

Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A, Perry R. Microleakage of resin-based liner materials and

condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Dent 2003; 16:351-5.

Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the

dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994; 7:44-6.

Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage

measured in the same Class I restorations. Dent Mater 1992; 8:37-41.

Gwinnett AJ, Dickerson WG, Yu S. Dentin bond shear strength and microleakage for Syntac/Heliomolar: a

comparison between the manufacturer's and total etch technique. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:164-8.

Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM, Denys FR. Evaluation of the syntac bonding system. Am J Dent

; 6:17-21.

Prati C, Chersoni S, Pashley DH. Effect of removal of surface collagen fibrils on resin-dentin bonding. Dent

Mater 1999; 15:323-31.

Saboia VP, Rodrigues AL, Pimenta LA. Effect of collagen removal on shear bond strength of two single-

bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2000; 25:395-400.

Soeno K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M, Suzuki S. Adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to collagendepleted dentin--effect of conditioner with ascorbic acid/ferric chloride. Dent Mater J 2004; 23:100-105.

Sandra Guzmán-Ruiz, Steven RA, Deborah SC, Marcos AV. Association between microtensile bond strength

and leakage in the indirect resin composite/dentin adhesively bonded joint. J Dent 2001; 29:145-53.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-28

How to Cite

Araby, A. M. E. (2011). Evaluation Method of Bonding To Root Canal Dentin After Sodium Hypochlorite Treatment*. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences (JDUHS), 5(3), 103–110. Retrieved from https://jduhs.com/index.php/jduhs/article/view/1488

Issue

Section

Original Articles