Utility of Flexible Fiberoptic Nasolaryngoscopyin Assessment of Laryngeal Lesions Among Suspected Patients Living in Karachi, Pakistan

SyedaUzma Naqvi1, Sadaf Zia1, Muhammad Shuja Farrukh1, Murtaza Ahsan Ansari1, Atif Hafeez Siddiqui2

1. Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.

2. Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.

https://doi.org/10.36570/jduhs.2019.2.618

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the utility of flexible fiberoptic nasolaryngoscopyin diagnosi-nglaryngeal lesions and identifying factorscontributing to the development of serious laryngeal pathologies among suspicious patients.

Methodology:A cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2017 to August 2018 at Dow University Hospital. Patients who came to an ENT outpatient clinic with a complaint of hoarseness, dysphagia, andsortness of breath (SOB) were asked to undergo Fiber optic laryngoscopy (FODL) examination. Laryngeal pathologies were noted on FODL along with demographic characteristics, presenting complaints, and aggravating factors.

Results: Findings of the FODL showed that amongst 86 patientswith regular complains of upper respiratory disease,lesions were found to be higher in vocal cords (n=34, 39.5%), followed by posterior pharyngeal walls (n=19, 22.1%), and pyriform fossa (n=13, 15.1%). A significant association of pyriform was observed with history of radiaton(p-value 0.023). Similarly,posterior commissure was also found significantly associated with history of radiation (p-value 0.041).Moreover, exposure to air pollution was also found significantly associated with ary epiglottic folds (p-value 0.036), ventricular bands (p-value 0.004), vocal cords (p-value 0.004), anterior commissure (p-value 0.017), sub-glottis (p-value 0.016), and posterior pharyngeal walls (p-value 0.046).

Conclusion: Flexible nasolaryngoscopy was found very helpful in diagnosing laryngeal pathologies even at early stage.Furthermore, it also helps in the determination of factors that may contribute in development of serious laryngopharyngeal disorders among patients presenting with regular upper respiratory tract symptoms.

Keywords: Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy, laryngeal diseases, hoarseness, throat symptoms

Correspondence to:Dr. SyedaUzma Naqvi, Email: syedauzma555@gmail.com

 

INTRODUCTION

Laryngopharyngeal diseases are very common throughout the world.1 Numerous factors contribute to the development of laryngeal disorders. Various studies have reported environmental pollution and smoking dietary practices as a major contributing factors for larynx and hypopharynx diseases in a metropolitan town like Karachi.2-5

Incidence of malignancy of the head and neck has increased over the past decade.5,6 Current data from the Karachi Cancer Registry suggest that oral cavity cancer has the highest incidence among all male cancers and the second highest among all female cancers.7 The most commonly affected site in head and neck is buccal mucosa followed by lateral tongue border and then laryngopharyngeal area.8 Oral cavity and oropharynx tumors are given early attention by the patient and primary physician due to easily visible sites. On the other hand, larynx tumors are not directly visible to the patient or primary physicians. Other throat diseases, with the exception of vocal fold diseases, are either symptomless at an early stage or start with vague symptoms. Even if symptoms appear, the orolaryngeal region is considered a difficult area for a primary physician to examine.

Mirror examination is used as a basic tool to examine laryngopharynx, but its use is limited due to reduced mouth opening or excessive gag reflex. Flexible nasolaryngoscopy is a significant diagnostic tool in investigating patients with laryngeal/ voice disorder.9So, patients with these disorders do not consult otolaryngologist till the advanced stage of the disease which greatly affects disease outcome resulting in increased morbidity and even mortality.

Fiberoptic direct laryngoscopy (FODL) has greatly helped otolaryngologist in early detection of larynx and hypopharynx anomalies.10- 13 It is used as an office based procedure under localanaesthesia via 4% topical xylocaine spray over nose and throat.

FODL allows otoaryngologist to directly examine detailed anatomy of nose, nasopharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. It also allows assessing laryngopharyngeal movements during deglutition and vocal cords movements during phonation. So, it is the best tool to assess laryngopharyngeal functions during swallowing and phonation, in centers, where facility of very expensive stroboscopy is not available.4

In this study, we used FODL as a tool in finding out etiopathogenesis of various laryngopharyngeal disorders and studied its use in individuals at risk of developing laryngeal anomalies.

 

METHODS

A cross sectional study was conducted in Dow UniversityHospital from August 2017 to August 2018. All patients above 18 years of age who came to outpatient clinic of ENT with complain of hoarseness or change of voice, dysphagia and difficulty in breathing were asked forFiber optic laryngoscopy examination. Patients having anxiety or suffering with acute asthma were excluded.

A solution of 0.25% or 0.5% Xylometazoline sprayed in nose and another spray of 4% Xylocain was also applied in both nostrils to locally anesthetise nose and pharynx of the patient. A flexible fiberoptic direct laryngoscope of 0.5 mm diameter was introduced into either of nostril and negotiated through posterior chonae and nasopharynxto visualize laryngoharynx. The findings of FODL were also noted on a predesigned proforma that also includes information regarding the age, sex, occupation, exposure to pollution, associated habits such as smoking.

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

For the purpose of statistical analysis, SPSS version 23 was used. Mean +-SD was calculated for quantitative variable like age of the patients. Frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables like gender,presenting complaints, aggravating factors and lesion screened on flexible endoscopy. Comparison was also done to see the association of lesion screened on flexible endoscopy with baseline characteristics. Fisher-Exacttest was applied. p-value <0.05 was taken as significant.

 

RESULTS

Out of total 86 patients, the mean age was 47.21 +-15.51 years. Majority (n=55, 64%) were males. Hoarseness was the most common complaint reported by 37 (43%) of the patients followed by dysphagia (n=17, 19.8%) and shortness of breath (n=10, 11.6%). The most common aggravating factor was substance abuse (n=28, 32.6%). (Table 1)

The findings of flexible endoscopy screening showed thatthe highest number of lesion was found on vocal cords (n=34, 39.5%), followed by posterior pharyngeal wall (n=19, 22.1%), pyriform fossa (n=13, 15.1%), posterior commissure (n=10, 11.6%), anterior commissure (n=10, 11.6%), ventricular bands (n=8, 9.3%), sub-glottis (n=7, 8.1%), epiglottis (n=6, 7%), ary epiglottis (n=6, 7%), base of tongue (n=4, 4.7%) while valleculae in 3 (3.5%) patients. (Figure 1)

A non-significant association of lesion screened on FODL was observed with demographic variables and presenting complaint (p-value >0.05). Whereas comparison of aggravating factors showed that pyriform fossa was significantly associated with radiation history (p-value 0.023) followed by posterior commissure (p-value 0.041). (Figure 2) Furthermore, a significant association of exposure to air pollution was also observed with ary epiglottic folds (p-value 0.036), ventricular bands (p-value 0.004), vocal cords (p-value 0.004), anterior commissure (p-value 0.017), sub-glottis (p-value 0.016), and posterior pharyngeal wall (p-value 0.046). (Table 2)

 

Table 1: General Characteristics of the Patients (n=86)

 

n

%

Age, years

47.21 +-15.51*

Gender

Male

55

64

Female

31

36

Presenting complaint

Hoarseness

54

62.8

Dysphagia

21

24.4

SOB

12

14

Common aggravating factors

Substance abuse

28

32.6

Exposure to air pollution

8

9.3

Voice Abuse

7

8.1

Neck trauma

2

2.3

History of radiation

5

5.8

*mean +-SD, n: number, SOB: Shortness of breath

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: Frequency of lesion screened on flexible endoscopy (n=86)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2 : Comparison of radiation exposure with (a) pyriform fossa lesion and (b) posterior commissure lesion

 

Table 2: Comparison of lesions with and without exposure to air pollution as screened on flexible endoscopy (n=86)

Exposure to Air Pollution

Total

Yes

No

p-value*

 

Base of tongue

 

Lesion

4

0 (0)

4 (100)

0.512

 

Normal

82

8 (9.8)

74 (90.2)

 

Valleculae

 

Lesion

3

0 (0)

3 (100)

0.572

 

Normal

83

8 (9.6)

75 (90.4)

 

Epiglottis

 

Lesion

6

1 (16.7)

5 (83.3)

0.520

 

Normal

80

7 (8.8)

73 (91.3)

 

Ary Epiglottic folds

 

Lesion

6

2 (33.3)

4 (66.7)

0.036

 

Normal

80

6 (7.5)

74 (92.5)

 

Ventricular Bands

 

Lesion

8

3 (37.5)

5 (62.5)

0.004

 

Normal

78

5 (6.4)

73 (93.6)

 

Vocal Cords

 

Lesion

34

7 (20.6)

27 (79.4)

0.004

 

Normal

52

1 (1.9)

51 (98.1)

 

Anterior Commissure

 

Lesion

10

3 (30)

7 (70)

0.017

 

Normal

76

5 (6.6)

71 (93.4)

 

Posterior Commissure

 

Lesion

10

2 (20)

8 (80)

0.215

 

Normal

76

6 (7.9)

70 (92.1)

 

Sub Glottis

 

Lesion

7

3 (42.9)

4 (57.1)

0.016

 

Normal

79

5 (6.3)

74 (93.7)

 

Pyriform Fossa

 

Lesion

13

3 (23.1)

10 (76.9)

0.063

 

Normal

73

5 (6.8)

68 (93.2)

 

Posterior Pharyngeal Wall

 

Lesion

19

4 (21.1)

15 (78.9)

0.046

 

Normal

67

4 (6)

63 (94)

 

*Fisher-exact test applied, p-value <0.05 taken as significant

 

 

DISCUSSION

Fiber-optic laryngoscopy in clinical setting carries greater chance in making early diagnosisof laryngeal as well as hypopharyngealdiseases including benign, pre-malignant and malignant lesions especially in those who cannot tolerate indirect mirror laryngoscopy.14

Although it is recommended to utilize FODL examination as screening tool for early detection of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal lesions.However in a surveyit was found that 56% otolaryngologists do not perform FODL, mostly either due to non-availability of fiberoptic flexible laryngoscopes or because of lack of expertise in performing procedure.15Zhaoyong et al16 reported presence of heavy metals loaded industrial dust in environment. Therefore presence of metalloid particles in free air have become one major reason for development of premalignant and malignant lesions of aero-digestive tract. Since Karachi is a major industrial city, the majority of its inhabitants face problems of air pollution and air borne allergies. People are at risk because ofthick congested population causing pollutionwhich is typical of industrial cities, hence habitant of industrial cities havehigher chances of developing laryngeal abnormalities.

Most of the general physiciansare not skilled in doing mirror laryngoscopy or FODL. The lack in performing these basic clinical examination in routine practice has led to failure in early detection of even minor pathologies that might ultimately progress into advanced stage and hence increaseburden of diseases upontertiary healthcare centres. These diseases if identified at their early hospital visits, would definitely result in better outcome. As in our study, 4.7% subjects had minor ulcers on their base of tongue and 3.5%had small masses at valleculae, raised the strong suspicion of being malignant were later diagnosed as so on biopsy, making their definitive treatment possible at an initial stage with successful outcome.

Symptoms of supra-glottic and glottic anomalies often mimic with common upper respiratory tract diseases e.g. sore throat, post-nasal drip, laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR), allergic pharyngitis, laryngitis and need to be appropriately differentiated by taking history and doing proper clinical laryngoscopic examination of patients along with FODL.The diagnostic accuracy remain only around 5% in patientspresenting with change in voice, sore throat and dysphagia if fiberoptic direct laryngoscopy is not performed, while accuracy increases upto 68.3% with endoscopic assessment.17This finding was also reflected in our study where34%patients referred from other centres with failed diagnosisfor any laryngeal problems were found to have masses ataryepiglttic folds, pyriform fossae,and vocal cords on FODL.

In the current study, hoarseness was the most common complaint reported followed by dysphagia and shortness of breath. The most common causative factor was identified as tobbaco substance abuse.

American Broncho-esophageal Associationreported that initial endoscopic laryngeal examination was found very helpful.18Efficacy of videolaryngoscopy has been emphasized since long time19. Our study also reveals that in some of the patients, initially taken history was indicative of chroniclaryngitisorgastroesophageal reflux byvirtue of FODL examinationthey were diagnosed to have laryngeal edema or vocal nodules.In Karachi, many ENT clinics and even primary and secondry care hospitals are not equipped with this essential diagnostic tool. We receive many referrals from nearby and remote areas withoutproper examination findings and diagnosis.

Endoscopies are usually helpful however disparityamong different examiners especially in discrimination ofvocaledema, mucosal thickening,small nodules versus normal structure could arise.20In those cases where findings were ambiguous, we offered medical treatment if it resultsin significant symptomatic and physical improvement then no need for further intervention. However in cases where findings remain unchanged, we advisepatients for direct laryngoscopy with biopsy where necessary.Findings of our flexible endoscopy screening showed that highest number of lesionwere found atvocal cords followed by posterior pharyngeal wall, and pyriform fossa.

The limited number of sample size wasa major limitation of this study. As diseases of larynopharyngeal region is of big magnitude in Karachi,for finding the prevalence of disease it is neededthat larger numbers of patientsfrom other tertiary centresmust be screened.

 

CONCLUSION

Flexible nasolaryngoscopyscan was found to be helpful in the early diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal disorders in patients with regular complaints of upper respiratory tract disease.This is not only a cost-effective and anesthesia-free modality but also enables in the early diagnosis of the illnesses. Therefore, flexible nasolaryngoscopyexamination is highly recommended in routine checkups at primary and secondary health units.

 

REFFERENCES

1.       Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward F, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T,et al.Cancer statistics,2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58:71-96.

2.       Akhtar A,Hussain I, Talha M, Shakeel M, Faisal M, Ameen M, et al.Prevalance and diagnostic of head and neck cancer in Pakistan. Pak JPharm Sci2016: 29:1839-46.

3.       Talamini R, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C, Dal Maso L, Levi F, Bidoli E, et al. Combined effect of tobacco and alcohol on laryngeal cancer risk: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 2002; 13:957-64.

4.       Beynon RA, Lang S, Schimansky S, Penfold CM, Waylen A, Thomas SJ, et al. Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking at diagnosis of head and neck cancer and all-cause mortality: Results from head and neck 5000, a prospective observational cohort of people with head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:1114-27.

5.       Vigneswaran N, Williams MD. Epidemiological trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2014; 26:123-41.

6.       Jakobsen KK, Gronhoj C, Jensen DH,Agander TK, Specht L,von Buchwald C. Increasing incidence and survival of head and neck cancers in Denmark: a nation-wide study from 1980 to 2014. Acta Oncol 2018;57:1143-51.

7.       Qureshi MA, Mirza T, Khan S, Sikandar B, Zahid M, Aftab M, et al.Cancer patterns in Karachi (all districts), Pakistan: First results (2010-2015) from a Pathology based cancer registry of the largest government-run diagnostic and reference center of Karachi.Cancer Epidemiol2016; 44:114-22.

8.       Ahmad Z, Idress R, Fatima S, Uddin N, Ahmed A, Minhas K, et al.commonest cancers in pakistan - findings and histopathological perspective from a premier surgical pathology center in Pakistan.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 17:1061-75.

9.       Marcus S, Timen M, Dion GR, Fritz MA, Branski RC. Cost analysis of channeled, distal chip laryngoscope for in‐office laryngopharyngeal biopsies. J Voice2018;30522-2. [Epub ahead of print]

10.    Manica D, Schweiger C, Sekine L,Fagondes SC,Kuhl G,Collares MV,et al. The role of flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy in robin sequence: a systematic review. JCraniomaxillo-fac Surg 2017; 45:210-5.

11.    Quimby A.E, Kohlert S, Caulley L. Smartphone adapters for flexible Nasolaryngoscopy: a systematic review. JOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 47:30.

12.    Moumoulidis I, Gray RF, Wilson T; Outpatient fibre-optic laryngoscopy for stridor in children and infants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2005; 262:204-7.

13.    Wellenstein DJ, Schutte HW, Takes RP, Honings J, Marres HA, Burns JA, et al.Office‐based procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal pathology. J Voice2018; 32:502-13.

14.    Lee F,Smith KA,Chandarana S, Matthews TW, Bosch JD, Nakoneshny SC, et al. An evaluation of in-office flexible fiber-optic biopsies for laryngopharyngeal lesions. JOtolaryngolHead Neck Surg 2018; 47:31.

15.    Sulica L, Behrman A. Management of benign vocal fold lesions: a survey of current opinion and practice. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 2003; 112:827-33.

16.    Zhaoyong Z, Mamat A. Simayi Z. Pollution assessment and health risks evaluation of (metalloid) heavy metals in urban street dust of 58 cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2018:1-15.

17.    Paul BC, Chen S, Sridharan S, Fang Y, Amin MR, Branski RC. Diagnostic accuracy of history, laryngoscopy, and stroboscopy. Laryngoscope 2013; 123:215-9.

18.    Paul BC, Branski RC, Amin MR. Diagnosis and management of new-onset hoarseness: a survey of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 2012; 121:629- 34.

19.    Casiano RR, Zaveri V, Lundy DS. Efficacy of videostroboscopy in the diagnosis of voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 107:95-100.

20.    Brant JA, Leahy K, Mirza N, Diagnostic utility of flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy recorded onto a smartphone: A pilot study.World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 4:135-9.